Template:Very longTemplate:Infobox military conflict Template:Campaignbox Waziristan Template:Campaignbox US war in Afghanistan

The United States government has made hundreds of attacks on targets in northwest Pakistan since 2004 using drones (unmanned aerial vehicles) controlled by the Central Intelligence Agency's Special Activities Division.[1] These attacks are part of the United States' War on Terrorism campaign, seeking to defeat Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants in Pakistan.[1] Most of these attacks are on targets in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas along the Afghan border in Northwest Pakistan. These strikes have increased substantially under the Presidency of Barack Obama.[2] Some media refer to the series of attacks as a "drone war".[3][4] The covert CIA-run program is a cause of tension between the U.S. and Pakistan.

Pakistan's government publicly condemns these attacks, but has secretly shared intelligence with the United States[5] and also allegedly allowed the drones to operate from Shamsi Airfield in Pakistan until 21 April 2011, when 150 Americans left the base.[6] According to secret diplomatic cables leaked by Wikileaks, Pakistan's Army Chief Ashfaq Parvez Kayani not only tacitly agreed to the drone flights, but in 2008 requested Americans to increase them.[7] However, Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik said, "drone missiles cause collateral damage. A few militants are killed, but the majority of victims are innocent citizens."[8] The strikes are often linked to anti-American sentiment in Pakistan and the growing questionability of the scope and extent of CIA activities in Pakistan.

Reports of the number of militants versus civilian casualties differ.[9] In a 2009 opinion article, Daniel L. Byman of the Brookings Institution wrote that drone strikes may have killed "10 or so civilians" for every "mid- and high-ranking [al Qaeda and Taliban] leader."[10] In contrast, the New America Foundation has estimated that 80 percent of those killed in the attacks were militants.[11] The Pakistani military has stated that most of those killed were hardcore Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants.[12] The CIA believes that the strikes conducted since May 2010 have killed over 600 militants and have not caused any civilian fatalities, a claim that experts disputed and have called absurd.[9] Based on extensive research, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism found that between 391 – 780 civilians were killed out of a total of between 1,658 and 2,597 and that 160 children are reported among the deaths. The Bureau also revealed that since President Obama took office at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims and more than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners, tactics that have been condemned by legal experts.[13][14][15] Barbara Elias-Sanborn has also cautioned that, "as much of the literature on drones suggests, such killings usually harden militants' determination to fight, stalling any potential negotiations and settlement."[16]

Drone strikes were halted in November 2011 after NATO forces killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in the Salala incident.[17] Shamsi Airfield was evacuated of Americans and taken over by the Pakistanis December 2011.[18] The incident prompted an approximately two-month stop to the drone strikes, which resumed on 10 January 2012.

Statistics[edit | edit source]

1) US Drone Strike Statistics estimate according to the New America Foundation analysis of Newspaper articles.[19] (As of September 25, 2012)
Year Number of
Number Killed
Min. Max.
2004 1 5 8
2005 3 12 13
2006 2 90 102
2007 4 48 77
2008 36 219 344
2009 54 350 721
2010 122 608 1,028
2011 72 366 599
2012 37 179 285
Total 330 1,877 3,177

2) US Drone Strike statistic based on months of research by a team of journalists of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism:[20][13]

(as of September 25, 2012)

  • Total reported killed: 2,570 – 3,337
  • Civilians reported killed: 474 – 884
  • Children reported killed: 176
  • Total reported injured: 1,232 – 1,366
  • Strikes under the Bush Administration: 52
  • Strikes under the Obama Administration: 294
  • Total strikes: 346

US viewpoint[edit | edit source]

George W. Bush vastly-accelerated the drone strikes the final year of his presidency. A list of the high-ranking victims of the drones was provided to Pakistan in 2009.[21] Obama has broadened these attacks to include targets seeking to destabilize Pakistani civilian government and the attacks of 14 and 16 February 2009 were against training camps run by Baitullah Mehsud.[22] On 25 February 2009 Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA indicated the strikes will continue.[23] On 4 March 2009 The Washington Times reported that the drones were targeting Baitullah Mehsud.[24] Obama was reported in March 2009 as considering expanding these strikes to include Balochistan[25]

On 25 March 2010 US State Department legal advisor Harold Koh stated that the drone strikes were legal because of the right to self-defense. According to Koh, the US is involved in an armed conflict with al-Qaida, the Taliban, and their affiliates and therefore may use force consistent with self-defense under international law.[26]

Former CIA officials state that the agency uses a careful screening process in making decisions on which individuals to kill via drone strikes. The process, carried out at the agency's counterterrorist center, involves up to 10 lawyers who write briefs justifying the targeting of specific individuals. According to the former officials, if the briefs' arguments are weak, the request to target the individual is denied.[27] Since 2008 the CIA has relied less on its list of individuals and increasingly targeted "signatures," or suspect behavior. This change in tactics has resulted in fewer deaths of high-value targets and in more deaths of lower-level fighters, or "mere foot soldiers" as the one senior Pakistani official told the Washington Post.[28]

US officials stated in March 2009 that the Predator strikes had killed nine of al-Qaeda's 20 top commanders. The officials added that many top Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders, as a result of the strikes, had fled to Quetta or even further to Karachi.[29]

Some US politicians and academics have condemned the drone strikes. US Congressman Dennis Kucinich asserted that the United States was violating international law by carrying out strikes against a country that never attacked the United States.[30] Georgetown University professor Gary D. Solis asserts that since the drone operators at the CIA are civilians directly engaged in armed conflict, this makes them "unlawful combatants" and possibly subject to prosecution.[27]

US military reports asserted that al-Qaeda is being slowly but systematically routed because of these attacks, and that they have served to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discord among their ranks. They also claimed that the drone attacks have addled and confused the Taliban, and have led them to turn against each other.[31] In July 2009 it was reported that (according to US officials) Osama Bin Laden's son Saad bin Laden was believed to have been killed in a drone attack earlier in the year.[32]

During a protest against drone attacks, in an event sponsored by Nevada Desert Experience, Father Louie Vitale, Kathy Kelly, Stephen Kelly, SJ, Eve Tetaz, John Dear, and others were arrested outside Creech Air Force Base on Wednesday 9 April 2009.[33][34]

In May 2009 it was reported that the USA was sharing drone intelligence with Pakistan.[35] Leon Panetta reiterated on 19 May 2009 that the US intended to continue the drone attacks.[36]

In December 2009 expansion of the drone attacks was authorized by President Barack Obama to parallel the decision to send 30,000 more American troops to Afghanistan.[37] Senior US officials are reportedly pushing for extending the strikes into Quetta in Balochistan against the Quetta Shura.[38] Speaking at a news conference in Islamabad on 7 January 2010 Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman stated the drone attacks were effective and would continue but stated that US would make greater efforts to prevent collateral damage.[39] In an effort to strengthen trust with Pakistan 'US sharing drone surveillance data with Pakistan, says Mike Mullen '[40] US defence budget for 2011 asked for a 75% increase in funds to enhance the drone operations.[41]

Compare Mr. Obama's use of drone strikes with that of his predecessor. During the Bush administration, there was an American drone attack in Pakistan every 43 days; during the first two years of the Obama administration, there was a drone strike there every four days.[42]

Peter Bergen, April 2012

The Associated Press (AP) noted that Barack Obama apparently expanded the scope and increased the aggressiveness of the drone campaign against militants in Pakistan after taking office. According to the news agency, the US increased strikes against the Pakistani Taliban, which earned favor from the Pakistani government, resulting in increased cooperation from Pakistani intelligence services. Also, the Obama administration toned down the US government's public rhetoric against Islamic terrorism, garnering better cooperation from other Islamic governments. Furthermore, with the drawdown of the war in Iraq, more drones, support personnel, and intelligence assets became available for the campaigns in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Since Obama took office, according to the AP, the number of drones operated by the CIA over Afghanistan and Pakistan doubled.[43] A May 2010 Reuters report quoted unnamed counterterrorism officials who speculated that the Obama administration's closure of the secret CIA interrogation centers and intent to close the Guantanamo Bay prison was a direct influence on the expansion of the drone targeted killings. According to the officials, the killings are necessary because there is no longer any place to put captured terrorists.[44]

A study called 'The Year of the Drone" published in February 2010 by the New America Foundation found that from a total of 114 drone strikes in Pakistan between 2004 and early 2010, approximately between 834 and 1,216 individuals had been killed. About two thirds of whom were thought to be militants and one third were civilians.[19]

On 28 April 2011, president Barack Obama appointed General David Petraeus as director of the CIA overseeing the drone attacks. According to Pakistani and American officials this could further inflame relations between the two nations.[45]

According to the Washington Post, as of September 2011, around 30 Predator and Reaper drones were operating under CIA direction in the Afghanistan/Pakistan area of operations. The drones are flown by United States Air Force pilots located at an unnamed base in the United States. US Department of Defense armed drones, which also sometimes take part in strikes on terrorist targets, are flown by US Air Force pilots located at Creech Air Force Base and Holloman Air Force Base. The CIA drones are operated by an office called the Pakistan-Afghanistan Department, which operates under the CIA's Counterterrorism Center (CTC), based at CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia. As of September 2011, the CTC had about 2,000 people on staff.[46][47]

US President Obama admitted on 30 January 2012 that the US was conducting drone strikes in Pakistan. He stressed that civilian casualties in the strikes were low.[48] The Obama administration offered its first extensive explanation on drone-strike policy in April 2012, concluding that it was "legal, ethical, and wise".[49] The CIA's general counsel, Stephen Preston, in a speech entitled "CIA and the Rule of Law" at Harvard Law School on 10 April 2012, claimed the agency was not bound by the laws of war; in response, Human Rights Watch called for the strike program to be brought under the control of the US military.[50]

In a February 2012 poll, 83% of Americans (77% of the liberal Democrats) replied they support the drone strikes.[51] In May, the US began stepping up drone attacks after talks at the NATO summit in Chicago did not lead to the progress it desired regarding Pakistan's continued closure of its Afghan borders to the alliance's supply convoys.[52]

At Senator Dianne Feinstein's insistence, beginning in early 2010 staffs of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have begun reviewing each CIA drone strike. The staff members hold monthly meetings with CIA personnel involved with the drone campaign, review videos of each strike, and attempt to confirm that the strike was executed properly.[53]

Pakistani response[edit | edit source]

File:Image said to be Predator drone aircraft at Shamsi Airbase in Pakistan -- no longer available on Google Earth..jpg

Shamsi airbase in 2006, reported to show three Predator drones.[54]

Pakistan has repeatedly protested these attacks as they are an infringement of its sovereignty and because civilian deaths have also resulted, including women and children, which has further angered the Pakistani government and people.[49][55][56][57] General David Petraeus was told in November 2008 that these strikes were unhelpful.[58] However on 4 October 2008 The Washington Post reported that there was a secret deal between the US and Pakistan allowing these drone attacks.[59] US Senator Dianne Feinstein said in February 2009: “As I understand it, these are flown out of a Pakistani base.”[60] Pakistani foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi denied that this was true.[61]

On 28 September, a spokesman for the Pakistani army condemned Washington's killing of Pakistani civilians and warned of retaliatory action: "Border violations by US-led forces in Afghanistan, which have killed scores of Pakistani civilians, would no longer be tolerated, and we have informed them that we reserve the right to self defense and that we will retaliate if the US continues cross-border attacks."[62] When the Soviets were in Afghanistan, they too carried out aerial raids on Pakistani villages suspected of harboring rebel groups which caused a lot of civilian deaths.[63] During this time, the Pakistani Air Force managed to shoot down one of the Soviet aircraft that strayed into Pakistan.[64]

The British newspaper The Times stated on 18 February 2009 that the CIA was using Shamsi Airfield, 190 miles (310 km) southwest of Quetta and 30 miles (48 km) from the Afghan border, as its base for drone operations. Safar Khan, a journalist based in the area near Shamsi, told the Times, "We can see the planes flying from the base. The area around the base is a high-security zone and no one is allowed there."[65] [65] Top US officials confirmed to Fox News Channel that Shamsi Airfield had been used by the CIA to launch the drones since 2002.[54]

The drone attacks continue, despite repeated requests made by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari through different channels.[66][67] Baitullah Mehsud while claiming responsibility for the 2009 Lahore police academy attacks, stated that it was in retaliation for the drone attacks.[68] According to The Daily Telegraph, Pakistani intelligence has agreed to secretly provide information to the United States on Mehsud's and his militants' whereabouts while publicly the Pakistani government will continue to condemn the attacks.[69]

On 28 April 2009 Pakistan's consul general to the US, Aqil Nadeem, asked the US to hand over control of its drones in Pakistan to his government. Said Nadeem, "Do we want to lose the war on terror or do we want to keep those weapons classified? If the American government insists on our true cooperation, then they should also be helping us in fighting those terrorists."[70] President Zardari has also requested that Pakistan be given control over the drones but this has been rejected by the US who are worried that Pakistanis will leak information about targets to militants.[71] In December 2009 Pakistan's Defence minister Ahmad Mukhtar acknowledged that Americans were using Shamsi Airfield but stated that Pakistan was not satisfied with payments for using the facility.[72]

In an analysis published in Daily Times on 2 January 2010 author Farhat Taj challenged the view that the local people of Waziristan were against the drone attacks. Taj states on the basis of personal interviews with people in Waziristan that the locals in Waziristan support the attacks and see the drones as their 'liberators' from the clutches of Taliban and Pakistan's Intelligence agencies. She further challenged the government of Pakistan to provide accurate figures about the 'civilian' casualties and tell what methodology was used to collect this data. According to her 'The people of Waziristan are suffering a brutal kind of occupation under the Taliban and al Qaeda. It is in this context that they would welcome anyone, Americans, Israelis, Indians or even the devil, to rid them of the Taliban and al Qaeda.'[73] In response to this analysis Irfan Husain writing in Dawn agreed with her assessment and called for more drone attacks. He wrote 'We need to wake up to the reality that the enemy has grown very strong in the years we temporized and tried to do deals with them. Clearly, we need allies in this fight. Howling at the moon is not going to get us the cooperation we so desperately need. A solid case can be made for more drone attacks, not less.[74]

In December 2010 the CIA's Station Chief in Islamabad operating under the alias Jonathan Banks was hastily pulled from the country.[75][76] Lawsuits filed by families of victims of drone strikes had named Banks as a defendant, he had been receiving death threats, and a Pakistani journalist whose brother and son died in a drone strike called for prosecuting Banks for murder.[77][78]

In March 2011 the General Officer Commanding of 7th division of Pakistani Army, Major General Ghayur Mehmood delivered a briefing "Myths and rumours about US predator strikes" in Miramshah. He said that most of those who were killed by the drone strikes were Al-qaeda and Taliban terrorists. Military’s official paper on the attacks till 7 March 2011 said that between 2007 and 2011 about 164 predator strikes had been carried out and over 964 terrorists had been killed. Those killed included 793 locals and 171 foreigners. The foreigners included Arabs, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Chechens, Filipinos and Moroccans.[12]

On 9 December 2011, Pakistan's Army Chief Ashfaq Parvez Kayani issued a directive to shoot down US drones. A senior Pakistani military official said, "Any object entering into our air space, including U.S. drones, will be treated as hostile and be shot down."[79]

The daily Indian newspaper The Hindu reported that Pakistan reached a secret agreement with United States to readmit the attacks of guided airplanes on its soil. According to a high western official linked with the negotiations, the pact was signed by ISI chief Lieutenant General Shuja Ahmad Pasha, and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency general David Petraeus during a meeting in Qatar January 2012. According to The Hindu, Lieutenant General Pasha also agreed to enlarge the CIA presence in Shahbaz air base, near the city of Abbottabad, where Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden was terminated in May 2011.[80]

According to unnamed US government officials, beginning in early 2011 the US would fax notifications to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) detailing the dates and general areas of future drone attack operations. The ISI would send a return fax acknowledging receipt, but not approving the operation. Nevertheless, it appeared that Pakistan would clear the airspace over the area and on the dates designated in the US fax. After the May 2011 raid that killed bin Laden, the ISI ceased acknowledging the US faxes, but Pakistani authorities have appeared to continue clearing the airspace in the areas where US drones are operating. According to an unnamed Pakistani government official, the Pakistan government believes that the US sends the faxes primarily to support legal justification for the drone attacks.[81]

Al Qaeda response[edit | edit source]

Messages recovered from Osama bin Laden's home after his death in 2011, including one from then al Qaeda No. 3, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman reportedly, according to the Agence France-Presse and the Washington Post, expressed frustration with the drone strikes in Pakistan. According to an unnamed U.S. Government official, in his message al-Rahman complained that drone-launched missiles were killing al Qaeda operatives faster than they could be replaced.[82][83][84]

In June and July 2011, law enforcement authorities found messages on al Qaeda-linked websites calling for attacks against executives of drone aircraft manufacturer AeroVironment. Law enforcement believed that the messages were in response to calls for action against Americans by Adam Yahiye Gadahn.[85]

United Nations human rights concerns[edit | edit source]

On 3 June 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) delivered a report sharply critical of US tactics. The report asserted that the US government has failed to keep track of civilian casualties of its military operations, including the drone attacks, and to provide means for citizens of affected nations to obtain information about the casualties and any legal inquests regarding them.[86] Any such information held by the U.S. military is allegedly inaccessible to the public due to the high level of secrecy surrounding the drone attacks program.[87] The US representative at UNHRC has argued that the UN investigator for extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions does not have jurisdiction over US military actions,[86] while another US diplomat claimed that the US military is investigating any wrongdoing and doing all it can to furnish information about the deaths.[88]

On 27 October 2009 UNHRC investigator Philip Alston called on the US to demonstrate that it was not randomly killing people in violation of international law through its use of drones on the Afghan border. Alston criticized the US's refusal to respond to date to the UN's concerns. Said Alston, "Otherwise you have the really problematic bottom line, which is that the Central Intelligence Agency is running a program that is killing significant numbers of people and there is absolutely no accountability in terms of the relevant international laws."[89]

On 2 June 2010 Alston's team released a report on its investigation into the drone strikes, criticizing the United States for being, "the most prolific user of targeted killings" in the world. Alston, however, acknowledged that the drone attacks may be justified under the right to self-defense. He called on the US to be more open about the program. Alston's report was submitted to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights the following day.[90]

On June 7 2012, after a four-day visit to Pakistan, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay called for a new investigation into US drone strikes in Pakistan, repeatedly referring to the attacks as "indiscriminate," and said that the attacks constitute human rights violations. [91] In a report issued on 18 June 2012, Christof Heyns, U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, called on the US' Obama administration to justify its use of targeted assassinations rather than attempting to capture al Qaeda or Taliban suspects.[92]

Reactions from people in Waziristan[edit | edit source]

According to a public opinion survey conducted between November 2008 and January 2009 by the Pakistani Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy, public opinion held that the drone strikes in Federally Administered Tribal Areas were accurate and did not lead to anti-American sentiment and were effective in damaging the militants.[37] The researchers concluded that 'The popular notion outside the Pakhtun belt that a large majority of the local population supports the Taliban movement lacks substance.'[93] According to Farhat Taj a member of AIRRA the drones have never killed any civilians. Some people in Waziristan compare the drones to Ababils, the holy swallows sent by Allah to avenge Abraha, the invader of the Khana Kaaba.[94]

In an analysis published in Daily Times (Pakistan) on 2 January 2010 Farhat Taj, a research fellow at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Research, University of Oslo and a member of Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy discussed the issue of drone attacks with hundreds of people of Waziristan. She claims that they see the US drone attacks as their liberators from the clutches of Islamist militiants into which, they say, their state has wilfully thrown them. She claims that estimates about civilian casualties in the US and Pakistani media are wrong because after every attack Islamist militiants cordon off the area and no one, including the local villagers, is allowed to come even near the targeted place. The militants themselves collect the bodies, bury the dead and then issue the statement that all of them were innocent civilians. However, according to the people of Waziristan, the only civilians who have been killed so far in the drone attacks are women or children of the militants in whose houses/compounds they hold meetings. But that used to happen in the past and now they don’t hold meetings at places where women and children of the militants reside. In one case when the funeral procession of an Islamist commander was hit and some civilians were killed. But after the attack people got the excuse of not attending the funeral of slain militants or offering them food.

Farhat Taj claims that locals usually appreciate drone attacks when they compare it with the Pakistan Army’s attacks, which always result in collateral damage. People said that when a drone would hover over the skies, they wouldn’t be disturbed and would carry on their usual business because they would be sure that it does not target the civilians, but the same people would run for shelter when a Pakistani jet would appear in the skies because of its indiscriminate firing. They say that even in the same compound only the exact room – where a high value target (HVT) is present – is targeted and others in the same compound are spared.[95]

In response to this analysis Irfan Husain writing in Dawn agreed with Farhat Taj's assessment and called for more drone attacks. He wrote: "We need to wake up to the reality that the enemy has grown very strong in the years we temporized and tried to do deals with them. Clearly, we need allies in this fight. Howling at the moon is not going to get us the cooperation we so desperately need. A solid case can be made for more drone attacks, not less."[74]

In North Waziristan, to combat the strikes, a militant group called Khorasan Mujahedin targets people suspected of being informants. After a drone strike, the group kidnaps people from the area suspected of selling information that led to the strike, tortures, then usually kills them. The torture and executions are often videotaped then sold in street markets as warnings to others.[96]

Civilian casualties[edit | edit source]

According to unnamed counterterrorism officials, in 2009 or 2010 CIA drones began employing smaller missiles in airstrikes in Pakistan in order to reduce civilian casualties. The new missiles, called the Small Smart Weapon or Scorpion, are reportedly about the size of a violin case (21 inches long) and weigh 16 kg. The missiles are used in combination with new technology intended to increase accuracy and expand surveillance, including the use of small, unarmed surveillance drones to exactly pinpoint the location of targets. These "micro-UAVs" (unmanned aerial vehicles) can be roughly the size of a pizza platter and meant to monitor potential targets at close range, for hours or days at a time. One former U.S. official who worked with micro-UAVs said that they can be almost impossible to detect at night. "It can be outside your window and you won't hear a whisper," the official said.[97] The drone operators also have changed to trying to target insurgents in vehicles rather than residences to reduce the chances of civilian casualties.[11]

A January 2011 report by Bloomberg stated that civilian casualties in the strikes had apparently decreased. According to the report, the U.S. Government believed that 1,300 militants and only 30 civilians had been killed in drone strikes since mid-2008, with no civilians killed since August 2010.[98]

On 14 July 2009, Daniel L. Byman of the Brookings Institution stated that although accurate data on the results of drone strikes is difficult to obtain, it seemed that ten civilians had died in the drone attacks for every militant killed. He suggested that drone strikes may kill "10 or so civilians" for every militant killed, which would represent a civilian to combatant casualty ratio of 10:1. Byman argues that civilian killings constitute a humanitarian tragedy and create dangerous political problems, including damage to the legitimacy of the Pakistani government and alienation of the Pakistani populace from America. He suggested that the real answer to halting al-Qaeda's activity in Pakistan will be long-term support of Pakistan's counterinsurgency efforts.[10]

United States officials claim that interviews with locals do not provide accurate numbers of civilian casualties because relatives or acquaintances of the dead refuse to admit that the victims were involved in militant activities.[99]

The CIA reportedly passed up three chances to kill militant leaders, including Sirajuddin Haqqani, with drone missiles in 2010 because women and children were nearby. The New America Foundation believes that between zero and 18 civilians have been killed in drone strikes since 23 August 2010 and that overall civilian casualties have decreased from 25% of the total in prior years to an estimated 6% in 2010. The Foundation estimates that between 277 and 435 non-combatants have died since 2004, out of 1,374 to 2,189 total deaths.[99]

According to a report of the Islamabad-based Conflict Monitoring Center (CMC), as of 2011, more than 2000 persons have been killed, and most of those deaths were civilians. The CMC termed the CIA drone strikes as an "assassination campaign turning out to be revenge campaign", and showed that 2010 was the deadliest year so far as regards casualties resulting from drone attacks, with 134 strikes inflicting over 900 deaths.[100]

According to the Long War Journal, as of mid-2011, the drone strikes in Pakistan since 2006 had killed 2,018 militants and 138 civilians.[101] The New America Foundation stated in mid-2011 that since 2004 2,551 people have been killed in the strikes, with 80% of those militants. The Foundation stated that 95% of those killed in 2010 were militants.[11]

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism based on extensive research found in mid-2011 that at least 385 civilians were among the dead, including more than 160 children.[15]

The CIA has claimed that the strikes conducted between May 2010 and August 2011 killed over 600 militants and did not result in any civilian fatalities; this assessment has been criticized by Bill Roggio from the Long War Journal and other commentators as being unrealistic. Unnamed American officials who spoke to the New York Times claimed that, as of August 2011, the drone campaign had killed over 2,000 militants and approximately 50 noncombatants.[9]

An independent research site Pakistan Body Count run by Dr. Zeeshan-ul-hassan a Fulbright scholar keeping track of all the drone attacks claims that 2179 civilians were among the dead, out of which 12.4% were children and women .[102] A report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, released 4 February 2012, stated that from under the Obama administration (2008–2011) drone strikes killed between 282 and 535 civilians, including 60 children.[103]

The British human rights group Reprieve filed a case with the United Nations Human Rights Council, based on sworn affidavits by 18 family members of civilians killed in the attacks – many of them children. They are calling on the UNHRC "to condemn the attacks as illegal human rights violations."[104]

A February 2012 Associated Press investigation found that militants were the main victims of drone strikes in North Waziristan contrary to the "widespread perception in Pakistan that civilians... are the principal victims." The AP studied 10 drone strikes. Their reporters who spoke to about 80 villagers in North Waziristan were told that at least 194 people died in the ten attacks. According to the villagers 56 of those were either civilians or tribal police and 138 were militants, with 38 of the civilians dying in a single attack which took place on 17 March 2011. Villagers stated that one way to tell if civilians were killed was to observe how many funerals took place after a strike; the bodies of militants were usually taken elsewhere for burial, while civilians were usually buried immediately and locally.[105]

A September 2012 report by researchers from Stanford University and New York University criticized the drone campaign, stating that it was killing a high number of civilians and turning the Pakistani public against the United States. The report, compiled by interviewing witnesses, drone-attack survivors, and others in Pakistan provided by a Pakistani human rights organization, Foundation for Fundamental Rights, concluded that only 2% of drone strike victims are top militant leaders and just one in 50 victims are terrorists.[106] The report's authors did not estimate the numbers of total civilian casualties, but suggested that the February 2012 Bureau of Investigative Journalism report was more accurate than the Long War Journal report (both detailed above) on civilian casualties. The report also opined that the drone attacks were violations of international law, because the US government had not shown that the targets were direct threats to the US.[107]

Waziristan Peace March[edit | edit source]

Imran Khan, chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) political party in Pakistan, announced a Peace March to South Waziristan on 6-7 October, 2012 to create global awareness about innocent civilian deaths in US drone attacks. He proposed to take a rally of 100,000 people from Islamabad to South Waziristan. The South Waziristan administration denied the group permission for the rally on the grounds that they can not provide security,[108] but PTI has maintained that they will go ahead with the Peace March. Many International human rights activists and NGOs have shown their support to the Peace March, with former US colonel Anne Wright and British NGO Reprieve joining the Peace March. Pakistani Taliban have agreed to not attack the Peace rally and offered to provide security for the rally.[109]

Timeline[edit | edit source]

Main article: List of Drone Strikes in Pakistan

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Ghosh, Bobby; Thompson, Mark (1 June 2009). "The CIA's Silent War in Pakistan". TIME. http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1900248,00.html. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  2. Miller, Greg (27 December 2011). "Under Obama, an emerging global apparatus for drone killing". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/under-obama-an-emerging-global-apparatus-for-drone-killing/2011/12/13/gIQANPdILP_story.html. Retrieved 8 May 2012. 
  3. De Luce, Dan (20 July 2009). "No let-up in US drone war in Pakistan". Agence France-Presse. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iSx0O9rqfroVdyJRvKzbpSTdhemw. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  4. Bergen, Peter; Tiedemann, Katherine (3 June 2009). "The Drone War". New America Foundation. http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/drone_war_13672. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  5. Mazzetti, Mark; Mekhennet, Souad (11 December 2009). "Qaeda Planner in Pakistan Killed by Drone". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/world/asia/12drone.html. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  6. Hodge, Amanda (19 February 2009). "Pakistan allowing CIA to use airbase for drone strikes". Australian. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/pakistan-permits-cia-base-for-strikes/story-e6frg6t6-1111118893683. Retrieved 6 December 2011. 
  7. Allbritton, Chris (20 May 2011). "Pakistan army chief sought more drone coverage in '08: Wikileaks". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/20/us-pakistan-wikileaks-idUSTRE74J3UV20110520. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  8. "'F-16 jets knock down CIA drones'". Hindustan Times. 23 April 2011. http://www.hindustantimes.com/F-16-jets-knock-down-CIA-drones/Article1-688705.aspx. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Shane, Scott (11 August 2011). "C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/world/asia/12drones.html?_r=1. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 Byman, Daniel (14 July 2009). "Do Targeted Killings Work?". Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0714_targeted_killings_byman.aspx?. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 "Out of the blue". The Economist. 30 July 2011. http://www.economist.com/node/21524916. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 Sherazi, Zahir Shah (9 March 2011). "Most of those killed in drone attacks were terrorists: military". Dawn. http://www.dawn.com/2011/03/09/most-of-those-killed-in-drone-attacks-were-terrorists-military.html. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 Woods, Chris; Lamb, Christina (4 February 2012). "Obama terror drones: CIA tactics in Pakistan include targeting rescuers and funerals". Bureau of Investigative Journalism. http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/obama-terror-drones-cia-tactics-in-pakistan-include-targeting-rescuers-and-funerals/. Retrieved 7 February 2012. 
  14. Woods, Chris (11 August 2011). "Over 160 children reported among drone deaths". Bureau of Investigative Journalism. http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2011/08/11/more-than-160-children-killed-in-us-strikes/. Retrieved 27 December 2011. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Woods, Chris (10 August 2011). "Drone War Exposed – the complete picture of CIA strikes in Pakistan". Bureau of Investigative Journalism. http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2011/08/10/most-complete-picture-yet-of-cia-drone-strikes/. Retrieved 16 December 2011. 
  16. Elias-Sanborn, Barbara (2 February 2012). "The Pakistani Taliban's Coming Divide". Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137077/barbara-elias-sanborn/the-pakistani-talibans-coming-divide. Retrieved 13 March 2012. 
  17. CIA has suspended drone attacks in Pakistan, U.S. officials say
  18. "Pak forces take control of Shamsi airbase". IBNLive. 10 Dec 2011. http://ibnlive.in.com/news/pak-forces-take-control-of-shamsi-airbase/210683-56.html. 
  19. 19.0 19.1 "The Year of the Drone: An Analysis of U.S. Drone Strikes in Pakistan, 2004–2012". New America Foundation. http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones. Retrieved 24 July 2012. 
  20. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ReferenceA
  21. Drone strikes killed high-value targets, US tells Pakistan, Dawn (newspaper), 9 February 2009
  22. Obama Widens Missile Strikes Inside Pakistan, The New York Times, 21 February 2009
  23. Panetta indicates strikes will continue in Pakistan, International Herald Tribune, 26 February 2009
  24. U.S. takes fight to Taliban leader, The Washington Times, 4 March 2009
  25. U.S. Weighs Taliban Strike Into Pakistan, The New York Times, 17 March 2009
  26. Agence France-Presse, "U.S. offers argument for drone strikes", Japan Times, 28 March 2010, p. 1.
  27. 27.0 27.1 McKelvey, Tara, "Inside the Killing Machine", Newsweek, 13 February 2011.
  28. Miller, Greg (21 February 2011). "Increased U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan killing few high-value militants". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/20/AR2011022002975.html?sid=ST2011022104355. Retrieved 25 February 2011. 
  29. Sanger, David E., and Eric Schmitt, "U.S. Weighs Taliban Strike Into Pakistan", New York Times, 18 March 2009, p. 1.
  30. "US warned against sending troops to Pakistan: Congressman terms Bush’s decision an election issue -DAWN – Top Stories; September 14, 2008". Dawn. Pakistan. http://www.dawn.com/2008/09/14/top17.htm. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  31. U.S. missile strikes take heavy toll on Al Qaeda, officials say, The Los Angeles Times, 22 March 2009
  32. Bin Laden son 'probably killed', BBC, 23 July 2009
  33. "Resisting the Afghanistan – Pakistan War". Voices for Creative Nonviolence. 10 April 2009. http://vcnv.org/resisting-the-afghanistan-pakistan-war. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  34. "Ground the Drones". Nevadadesertexperience.org. http://www.nevadadesertexperience.org/issues/2009/ground_the_drones.htm. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  35. US Shares Drone Intelligence with Pakistan, But No Joint Control, Voice of America, 14 May 2009
  36. Drone attacks to continue in Pakistan: CIA chief, Dawn (newspaper), 19 May 2009
  37. 37.0 37.1 C.I.A. to Expand Use of Drones in Pakistan, The New York Times, 3 December 2009
  38. Drone attacks may be expanded in Pakistan, Los Angeles Times, 14 December 2009
  39. US senators defend drone attacks, Dawn (newspaper), 8 January 2010
  40. "US sharing drone surveillance data with Pakistan, says Mike Mullen, The United States has taken the unprecedented step of sharing with Islamabad surveillance data collected by drones flying along over Pakistan, the top US military officer said on Thursday.". The Daily Telegraph (London). 14 May 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5326126/US-sharing-drone-surveillance-data-with-Pakistan-says-Mike-Mullen.html. Retrieved 1 May 2010. 
  41. US plans 75pc increase in drone operations, Dawn (newspaper), 3 February 2010
  42. Bergen, Peter (26 April 2012). "Warrior in Chief". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/president-obama-warrior-in-chief.html. Retrieved 1 May 2012. 
  43. Apuzzo, Matt, (Associated Press), "Obama strategy widens assault on Pakistani, Afghan militants", 12 February 2010.
  44. Entous, Adam, "Special Report: How the White House learned to love the drone", Reuters, 18 May 2010.
  45. Perlez, Jane; Schmitt, Eric (28 April 2011). "Petraeus Appointment Could Inflame Relations With Pakistan". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/world/29petraeus.html. 
  46. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named wapo1Sept2011
  47. Barnes, Julian E., "U.S. Expands Drone Flights To Take Aim At East Africa", Wall Street Journal, 21 September 2011, p. 1.
  48. Landler, Mark, "Civilian Deaths Due To Drones Are Not Many, Obama Says", New York Times, 31 January 2012, p. 6.
  49. 49.0 49.1 Savage, Charlie (30 April 2012). "Top U.S. Security Official Says 'Rigorous Standards' Are Used for Drone Strikes". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/world/obamas-counterterrorism-aide-defends-drone-strikes.html. Retrieved 1 May 2012. 
  50. "US: Transfer CIA Drone Strikes to Military". Human Rights Watch. 20 April 2012. http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/04/20/us-transfer-cia-drone-strikes-military. Retrieved 11 May 2012. 
  51. Wilson, Scott; Cohen, Jon (8 February 2012). "Poll finds broad support for Obama's counterterrorism policies". Amnesty International. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-finds-broad-support-for-obamas-counterterrorism-policies/2012/02/07/gIQAFrSEyQ_story.html. Retrieved 2012-02-08. 
  52. Crilly, Bob (28 May 2012). "US steps up drone attacks in Pakistan after convoy talks fail". The Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/9294628/US-steps-up-drone-attacks-in-Pakistan-after-convoy-talks-fail.html. Retrieved 28 May 2012. 
  53. Dilanian, Ken, "Congress Zooms In On Drone Killings", Los Angeles Times, 25 June 2012, p. 1
  54. 54.0 54.1 "Official Confirms U.S. Using Pakistan Base to Launch Attacks,". Fox News Channel. 19 February 2009. Archived from the original on February 21, 2009. http://web.archive.org/web/20090221104846/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/19/google-image-shows-base-pakistan/. Retrieved 2 July 2009. 
  55. Pakistan protest to US ambassador, BBC, 20 November 2008
  56. Pakistan fury as CIA airstrike on village kills 18, The Daily Telegraph 16 January 2006
  57. Civilian deaths in Pakistan attack, Al Jazeera, 8 September 2008
  58. Petraeus, in Pakistan, Hears Complaints About Missile Strikes, The New York Times, 4 November 2008
  59. A Quiet Deal With Pakistan, The Washington Post, 4 October 2008
  60. US official says drones using Pakistan base, Dawn (newspaper), 14 February 2009
  61. Pakistani bases not being used for drone attacks: FM, Daily Times (Pakistan), 16 February 2009
  62. "Pakistan threatens to retaliate against US". Presstv.ir. http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=68818&sectionid=351020401. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  63. http://articles.latimes.com/1987-03-24/news/mn-291_1_afghan-air-force
  64. "1988–89 – Авиация в локальных конфликтах". skywar.ru. 16 February 1988. http://www.skywar.ru/afghan6.html. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  65. 65.0 65.1 Coghlan, Tom, Zahid Hussain, and Jeremy Page (18 February 2009). "Secrecy And Denial As Pakistan Lets CIA Use Airbase To Strike Militants". The Times (London): p. 1. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5755490.ece. Retrieved 2 July 2009. 
  66. Share intelligence, stop drone attacks: Zardari to US, NDTV 2 February 2009
  67. US drone strikes in Pakistan hours after sovereignty pledge, The Independent, 18 September 2008
  68. Lahore 'was Pakistan Taleban op', BBC, 31 March 2009
  69. Wilkinson, Isambard, "Pakistan 'Helps US Drone Attacks'", The Daily Telegraph, 4 April 2009.
  70. Christenson, Sig, "Pakistani: U.S. Should Cede Control Of Drones", San Antonio Express-News, 29 April 2009.
  71. Shah, Pir Zubair (17 May 2009). "25 Militants Are Killed in Attack in Pakistan". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/world/asia/17pstan.html. Retrieved 22 December 2011. 
  72. US forces using Shamsi airbase in Balochistan, Dawn (newspaper), 12 December 2009
  73. analysis: Drone attacks: challenging some fabrications —Farhat Taj, Daily Times (Pakistan), 2 January 2010
  74. 74.0 74.1 Howling at the moon, Dawn (newspaper), 9 January 2010
  75. Walsh, Declan,CIA chief in Pakistan leaves after drone trial blows his cover The Guardian, 17 December 2010.
  76. Journalist Calls for Death Penalty for CIA Station Chief Raw Story, 17 December 2010.
  77. Walsh, Declan, Pakistani journalist sues CIA for drone strike that killed relatives Guardian, 13 December 2010
  78. Mazzetti, Mark Pakistani Role Is Suspected in Revealing U.S. Spy’s Name New York Times, 17 December 2010.
  79. "Pakistan says U.S. drones in its air space will be shot down". 10 December 2011. http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/10/9352886-pakistan-says-us-drones-in-its-air-space-will-be-shot-down. Retrieved 29 December 2011. 
  80. The Hindu (February 25, 2012). "In secret deal, ISI allows U.S. drone war to resume". http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article2929240.ece. Retrieved September 25, 2012. 
  81. Entous, Adam, "U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes", Wall Street Journal, 26 September 2012, p. 1
  82. Agence France-Presse/Jiji Press, "Bin Laden was trying to rebuild drone-decimated terror network", Japan Times, 3 July 2011, p. 1.
  83. Stevens, John (2 July 2011). "Al Qaeda hit by credit crunch: Bin Laden emails reveal terror group is running out of cash". Daily Mail (London). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2010617/Bin-Ladens-fears-Al-Qaedas-future-revealed-emails.html. Retrieved 4 July 2011. 
  84. Miller, Greg, "Bin Laden Files Show Al-Qaeda Under Pressure", Washington Post, 2 July 2011, p. 1.
  85. Winton, Richard, "Al Qaeda-Linked Website Threatens Monrovia Company That Makes Military Drones", Los Angeles Times, 2 July 2011.
  86. 86.0 86.1 "U.N. envoy calls for probe into U.S. drone attacks". CNN. 4 June 2009. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/06/04/drone.attacks/. 
  87. Silverstein, Ken (12 June 2009). "Is Secrecy on Drone Attacks Hiding Civilian Casualties?". Harper's Magazine. http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/06/hbc-90005193. 
  88. MacInnis, Laura (3 June 2009). "UN envoy seeks more U.S. openness on war deaths". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL31016477. 
  89. "U.S. Use of Drones Queried by U.N.". New York Times. Reuters. 28 October 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/28nations.html. 
  90. Cloud, David, S. (3 June 2010). "U.N. report faults prolific use of drone strikes by U.S.". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/03/world/la-fg-cia-drones-20100603. 
  91. "UN wants investigation into drone attacks inside Pakistan". Agence France-Presse. 7 June 2012. http://dawn.com/2012/06/07/un-wants-investigation-into-drone-attacks-in-pakistan/. 
  92. Nebehay, Stephanie, "U.N. Investigator Decries U.S. Use Of Killer Drones", Reuters, 19 June 2012 (wire service report)
  93. Drone attacks – a survey, The News International, 5 March 2009
  94. analysis: Dangerous abyss of perceptions – Farhat Taj, Daily Times (Pakistan), 30 January 2010
  95. "Drone attacks: challenging some fabrications by Farhat Taj". Dailytimes.com.pk. 2 January 2010. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010%5C01%5C02%5Cstory_2-1-2010_pg3_5. Retrieved 27 March 2011. 
  96. Rodriguez, Alex, "Death Squads Target Informants", Los Angeles Times, 29 December 2011, p. 1.
  97. Warrick, Joby, and Peter Finn, Amid outrage over civilian deaths in Pakistan, CIA turns to smaller missiles, Washington Post, 26 April 2010
  98. Capaccio, Tony, and Jeff Bliss, "U.S. Said to Reduce Civilian Deaths After Increasing CIA Pakistan Strikes", Bloomberg, 31 January 2011.
  99. 99.0 99.1 Dilanian, Ken (22 February 2011). "CIA drones may be avoiding Pakistani civilians". Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-drone-strikes-20110222,0,5033756.story. Retrieved 1 January 2012. 
  100. 19 March 2011 "‘Army trying to cover up bad deal on Davis’". Thenews.com.pk. 19 March 2011. http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=4731&Cat=13&dt= 19 March 2011. Retrieved 19 May 2011. 
  101. Roggio, Bill, and Alexander Mayer, "Charting the data for US airstrikes in Pakistan, 2004 – 2011", Long War Journal, 5 July 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2011.
  102. http://pakistanbodycount.org/drone_attack
  103. Lamb, Christina, Chris Woods, and Rahimullah Yusufzai, "Covert CIA Drones Kill Hundreds Of Civilians", London Sunday Times, 5 February 2012, p. 28.
  104. [http://reprieve.org.uk/media/downloads/2012_02_22_PUB_drones_UN_HRC_complaint.pdf "COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE KILLING OF INNOCENT CITIZENS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN"] (pdf). February 22, 2012. http://reprieve.org.uk/media/downloads/2012_02_22_PUB_drones_UN_HRC_complaint.pdf. Retrieved September 25, 2012. 
  105. Abbot, Sebastian, Associated Press, "Study: Militants, Not Civilians, Are Primary Victims Of Drone Strikes", Arizona Republic, 26 February 2012.
  106. Daily Mail America's deadly double tap drone attacks are 'killing 49 people for every known terrorist in Pakistan' 25 September 2012 Retrieved 29/09/12
  107. Zucchino, David, "Study Slams Drone Use In Pakistan", Los Angeles Times, 25 September 2012, p. 3
  108. PTI denied permission for S. Waziristan rally [[1]]
  109. Pakistani Taliban offers Imran Khan security.[[2]]

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:U.S. strikes in Bajour/Waziristan Template:Afghanistan War Template:Pakistan – United States relations

Template:Taliban Template:Tehrik de:Drohnenangriffe in Pakistan fr:Attaques aériennes américaines au Pakistan pl:Lista amerykańskich nalotów w Pakistanie ur:پاکستان پر امریکی ڈرون حملے

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.