Template:Pp-semi Template:Infobox bilateral relations

Relations between India and Pakistan have been strained by a number of historical and political issues, and are defined by the violent partition of British India in 1947, the Kashmir dispute and the numerous military conflicts fought between the two nations. Consequently, even though the two South Asian nations share historic, cultural, geographic, and economic links, their relationship has been plagued by hostility and suspicion.

After the dissolution of the British Raj in 1947, two new sovereign nations were formed—the Union of India and the Dominion of Pakistan. The subsequent partition of the former British India displaced up to 12.5 million people, with estimates of loss of life varying from several hundred thousand to a million.[1] India emerged as a secular nation with a Hindu majority population and a large Muslim minority while Pakistan was established as an Islamic republic with an overwhelming Muslim majority population.[2][3]

Soon after their independence, India and Pakistan established diplomatic relations but the violent partition and numerous territorial disputes would overshadow their relationship. Since their independence, the two countries have fought three major wars, one undeclared war and have been involved in numerous armed skirmishes and military standoffs. The Kashmir dispute is the main center-point of all of these conflicts with the exception of the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971, which resulted in the secession of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).

There have been numerous attempts to improve the relationship—notably, the Shimla summit, the Agra summit and the Lahore summit. Since the early 1980s, relations between the two nations soured particularly after the Siachen conflict, the intensification of Kashmir insurgency in 1989, Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests in 1998 and the 1999 Kargil war. Certain confidence-building measures — such as the 2003 ceasefire agreement and the Delhi–Lahore Bus service — were successful in deescalating tensions. However, these efforts have been impeded by periodic terrorist attacks. The 2001 Indian Parliament attack almost brought the two nations on the brink of a nuclear war. The 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, which killed 68 civilians (most of whom were Pakistani), was also a crucial point in relations. Additionally, the 2008 Mumbai attacks carried out by Pakistani militants[4] resulted in a severe blow to the ongoing India-Pakistan peace talks.

Seeds of conflict during independence[edit | edit source]

Main article: Partition of India
File:Gandhi and Jinnah disagree 1946 - Kulwant Roy.jpg

Jinnah and Gandhi engaged in a heated conversation. A well-known photograph recently attributed to Kulwant Roy.

About half a million Muslims and Hindus were killed in communal riots following the partition of British India. Millions of Muslims living in India and Hindus and Sikhs living in Pakistan emigrated in one of the most colossal transfers of population in the modern era. Both countries accused each other of not providing adequate security to the minorities emigrating through their territory. This served to increase tensions between the newly-born countries.

According to the British plan for the partition of British India, all the 680 princely states were allowed to decide which of the two countries to join. With the exception of a few, most of the Muslim-majority princely-states acceded to Pakistan while most of the Hindu-majority princely states joined India. However, the decisions of some of the princely-states would shape the Pakistan-India relationship considerably in the years to come.

Junagadh dispute[edit | edit source]

File:Map GujDist Saurastra.png

Junagadh is one of the modern districts of Saurastra, Gujarat

Junagadh was a state on the southwestern end of Gujarat, with the principalities of Manavadar, Mangrol and Babriawad. It was not contiguous to Pakistan and other states physically separated it from Pakistan. The state had an overwhelming Hindu population which constituted more than 80% of its citizens, while the ruler of the state was a Muslim. Nawab of Junagadh, Mahabat Khan, acceded to Pakistan on 15 August 1947. Pakistan confirmed the acceptance of the accession on 15 September 1947.

India did not accept the accession as legitimate. The Indian point of view was that Junagadh was not contiguous to Pakistan and that the Hindu majority of Junagadh wanted it to be a part of India and that the state was had Indian territory on three sides. While the ruler of Junagadh claimed a border with Pakistan by sea.

The Pakistani point of view was that since Junagadh had a ruler and governing body who chose to accede to Pakistan, they should be allowed to do so. Junagadh, having a coastline, could have maintained maritime links with Pakistan.

Neither of the states was able to resolve this issue amicably and it only added fuel to an already charged environment. Sardar Patel, India's then Home Minister, felt that if Junagadh was permitted to go to Pakistan, it would create communal unrest across Gujarat. The government of India gave Pakistan time to void the accession and hold a plebiscite in Junagadh to pre empt any violence in Gujarat. Samaldas Gandhi formed a government-in-exile, the Arzi Hukumat (in Urdu: Arzi: Transitional, Hukumat: Government) of the people of Junagadh. Patel ordered the annexation of Junagadh's three principalities.

India cut off supplies of fuel and coal to Junagadh, severed air and postal links, sent troops to the frontier, and occupied the principalities of Mangrol and Babariawad that had acceded to India.[5] On 26 October, Nawab of Junagadh and his family fled to Pakistan following clashes with Indian troops. On 7 November, Junagadh's court, facing collapse, invited the Government of India to take over the State's administration. The Dewan of Junagadh, Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto, the father of the more famous Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, decided to invite the Government of India to intervene and wrote a letter to Mr. Buch, the Regional Commissioner of Saurashtra in the Government of India to this effect.[6] The Government of Pakistan protested. The government of India rejected the protests of Pakistan and accepted the invitation of the Dewan to intervene.[7] Indian troops occupied Junagadh on 9 November 1947.

Kashmir dispute[edit | edit source]

Main article: Kashmir conflict

Kashmir was a Muslim-majority princely state, ruled by a Hindu[8] king, Maharaja Hari Singh. At the time of the partition of India, Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of the state, preferred to remain independent and did not want to join either the Union of India or the Dominion of Pakistan. He wanted both India and Pakistan to recognise his princely state as an independent neutral country like Switzerland.[9] He wanted to make his state the Switzerland of the East since the population of the state depended on tourism and persons from all regions could come to an independent Jammu and Kashmir with ease. For this reason, he offered a standstill agreement (for maintaining the status quo) to both India and Pakistan. India refused the offer but Pakistan accepted it.

Rumours spread in Pakistan that Hari Singh was trying to accede Kashmir to India. Alarmed by this threat, a team of Pakistani forces were dispatched into Kashmir, fearing an Indian invasion of the region. Backed by Pakistani paramilitary forces, Pashtun Mehsud tribals[10] invaded Kashmir in October 1947 under the code name "Operation Gulmarg" to seize Kashmir. They reached and captured Baramulla on 25 October. They stayed for several days looting, raping, killing and plundering instead of moving on to Srinagar just 50 km away and capture its airfield which was not defended at all. Kashmir's security forces were too weak and ill-equipped to fight against Pakistan. Troubled by this invasion by Pakistani forces and fearing that his kingdom was about to end and independence was no longer an option, the Maharaja now turned to India and requested India for troops to safeguard Kashmir. Though Indian Prime Minister Nehru was ready to send the troops, the acting Governor General of India, Lord Mountbatten of Burma, advised the Maharaja to accede to India before India could send its troops. Hence, considering the emergent situation he signed the instrument of accession to the Union of India.[citation needed]

Charles Chevenix Trench writes in his 'The Frontier Scouts' (1985):

In October 1947... tribal lashkars hastened in lorries - undoubtedly with official logistic support - into Kashmir... at least one British Officer, Harvey-Kelly took part in the campaign. It seemed that nothing could stop these hordes of tribesmen taking Srinagar with its vital airfield. Indeed nothing did, but their own greed. The Mahsuds in particular stopped to loot, rape and murder; Indian troops were flown in and the lashkars pushed out of the Vale of Kashmir into the mountains. The Mahsuds returned home in a savage mood, having muffed an easy chance, lost the loot of Srinagar and made fools of themselves.

In the words of Gen Mohammad Akbar Khan (Brigadier-in-Charge, Pakistan, in his book "War for Kashmir in 1947"): "The uncouth raiders delayed in Baramulla for two (whole) days for some unknown reason."[11]

While the invading Pakistanis spread across the State and looted Baramulla town just 50 km from the state capital, Srinagar, for several days starting 25 October 1947, the Maharaja signed Instrument of Accession to the Dominion of India on 26 October 1947. Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah had already reached Delhi a day earlier on 25 October to persuade Nehru to send troops. He made no secret of the danger the State faced and asked Nehru to lose no time in accepting the accession and ensuring the speedy dispatch of Indian troops to the State. (Sheikh Abdullah corroborates this account in his Aatish e Chinaar (at pages 416 and 417) and records (at page 417) that V.P. Menon returned to Delhi on 26 October with signed Instrument of accession.)[12] These are photos of the two-page Instrument of Accession.


The Instrument of Accession to the Union of India signed on 26 October 1947, and accepted the following day.


Page 2, Instrument of Accession, with signatures of Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir, and Viscount Mountbatten of Burma, Governor-General of India.

The Instrument was accepted by the Governor-General of India the next day, 27 October 1947. With this signing by the Maharaja and acceptance by the Governor-General, the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir became a part of Dominion of India as per the Indian Independence Act 1947 passed by the British parliament.

By this time the raiders were close to the capital, Srinagar. Indian troops were airlifted from Delhi, landed at Srinagar airport in Kashmir on 27 October 1947 and secured the airport before proceeding to evict the invaders from Kashmir valley.

The Indian troops managed to evict the aggressors from parts of Kashmir but the onset of winter made much of the state impassable. After weeks of intense fighting between Pakistan and India, Pakistani leaders and the Indian Prime Minister Nehru declared a ceasefire and sought U.N. arbitration with the promise of a plebiscite. Sardar Patel had argued against both, describing Kashmir as a bilateral dispute and its accession as justified by international law.

In 1957, north-western Kashmir was fully integrated into Pakistan, becoming Azad Kashmir (Pakistan-administered Kashmir). In 1962, China occupied Aksai Chin, the northeastern region bordering Ladakh. In 1984, India launched Operation Meghdoot and captured more than 80% of the Siachen Glacier.

Pakistan maintains Kashmiris' right to self-determination through a plebiscite in accordance with an earlier Indian statement and a UN resolution and the promised plebiscite should be allowed to decide the fate of the Kashmiri people. India on the other hand asserts that with the Maharaja's signing the instrument of accession, Kashmir has become an integral part of India. Moreover, free and fair elections for the last sixty years to the state legislature and the national parliament, in which no separatist or secessionist has ever been elected, reflect the will of the people of the state.

Due to all such political differences, this dispute has been the subject of wars between the two countries in 1947 and 1965, and a limited conflict in 1999. The state remains divided between the two countries by the Line of Control (LoC), which demarcates the ceasefire line agreed upon in the 1947 conflict modified in 1972 as per Simla Agreement.

War of 1965[edit | edit source]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 started following Pakistan's Operation Gibraltar, which was designed to infiltrate forces into Jammu and Kashmir to precipitate an insurgency against rule by India.[13] The five-week war caused thousands of casualties on both sides. Most of the battles were fought by opposing infantry and armoured units, with substantial backing from air forces, and naval operations. It ended in a United Nations (UN) mandated ceasefire and the subsequent issuance of the Tashkent Declaration.

1971 Bangladesh Liberation War[edit | edit source]

Main article: Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Pakistan, since independence, was geo-politically divided into two major regions, West Pakistan and East Pakistan. East Pakistan was occupied mostly by Bengali people. In December 1971, following a political crisis in East Pakistan, the situation soon spiralled out of control in East Pakistan and India intervened in favour of the rebelling Bengali populace. The conflict, a brief but bloody war, resulted in an independence of East Pakistan. In the war, the Pakistani army swiftly fell to India, forcing the independence of East Pakistan, which separated and became Bangladesh. The Pakistani military, being a thousand miles from its base and defeated by superior forces, surrendered. Indian agency Research and Analysis Wing successfully created Bangladesh.[14][15] In the early 1970s the army of Pakistan prosecuted a bloody military crackdown in response to the Bangladesh independence movement.[16][17]

Wars, conflicts and disputes[edit | edit source]

Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars

Main article: Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts

India and Pakistan have fought in numerous armed conflicts since their independence. There are three major wars that have taken place between the two states, namely in 1947, 1965 and the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971. In addition to this was the unofficial Kargil War and some border skirmishes.

Kargil war[edit | edit source]

During the winter months of 1998-99, the Indian army vacated its posts at very high peaks in Kargil sector in Kashmir as it used to do every year. Pakistani Army intruded across the line of control and occupied the posts. Indian army discovered this in May 1999 when the snow thawed. This resulted in intense fighting between Indian and Pakistani forces, known as the Kargil conflict. Backed by the Indian Air Force, the Indian Army regained some of the posts that Pakistan has occupied. Pakistan later withdrew from the remaining portion under international pressure.

Other territorial disputes[edit | edit source]

Pakistan is locked in other territorial disputes with India such as the Siachen Glacier and Kori Creek.

Water disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Indo Pakistani Waters Conflict

The Indus Waters Treaty governs the rivers that flow from India into Pakistan. Water is cited as one possible cause for a conflict between the two nations, but to date issues such as the Nimoo Bazgo Project have been resolved through diplomacy.[18]

Bengal refugee crisis[edit | edit source]

In 1949, India recorded close to 1 million Hindu refugees, who flooded into West Bengal and other states from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), owing to communal violence, intimidation and repression from authorities. The plight of the refugees outraged Hindus and Indian nationalists, and the refugee population drained the resources of Indian states, which were unable to absorb them. While not ruling out war, Prime Minister Nehru and Sardar Patel invited Liaquat Ali Khan for talks in Delhi. Although many Indians termed this appeasement, Nehru signed a pact with Liaquat Ali Khan that pledged both nations to the protection of minorities and creation of minority commissions. Although opposed to the principle, Patel decided to back this Pact for the sake of peace, and played a critical role in garnering support from West Bengal and across India, and enforcing the provisions of the Pact. Khan and Nehru also signed a trade agreement, and committed to resolving bilateral disputes through peaceful means. Steadily, hundreds of thousands of Hindus returned to East Pakistan, but the thaw in relations did not last long, primarily owing to the Kashmir dispute.

Language disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Hindi–Urdu controversy

Racial disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Anti-Pakistan sentiment

Sports disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: India–Pakistan cricket rivalry

Religious disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Persecution of Hindus

Terrorism and state disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir

Ideological disputes[edit | edit source]

Main article: Two Nation Theory

Afghanistan[edit | edit source]

Both Pakistan and India consider their relations with Afghanistan as most important relations with any other country. Both countries have fought proxy wars against each other, and both countries are reportedly making an extensive efforts to gain influence on Afghan Government for their own regional interests. The Soviet Union in 1979 intervened to protect the fragile communist government and prevent the collapse of Afghanistan Soviet Socialist Republic (Afghanistan SSR) into the hands of hard-line Islamist forces. With the deployment of Soviet Union's 40th Army, new strains appeared in Indo-Pakistani relations, and proxy war between India and Pakistan began to take place first time in Afghanistan. Pakistan, with the backing of the United States, actively supported the Afghan resistance against the Soviet Union, which was a close ally of India, which brought opposing political opinions. India, on other hand, supported the communist government and vital support to communist government was provided by India.

After the Taliban defeated the Northern Alliance in much of Afghanistan in 1996 in civil war, the Taliban regime was strongly supported by Pakistan – one of the three countries to do so – before the September 11 attacks. India firmly opposed the Taliban and criticized Pakistan for supporting it. India established its links with Northern Alliance as India officially recognized their government, with the United Nations. India's relations with Afghanistan, Pakistan's neighbour, and its increasing presence there has irked Pakistan.

The 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul was a suicide bomb terror attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan on 7 July 2008 at 8:30 AM local time.[19] U.S. intelligence officials suggested that Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency had planned the attack.[20] Pakistan tried to deny any responsibility,[20][21] but United States President George W. Bush confronted Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani with evidence and warned him that in the case of another such attack he would have to take "serious action".[22]

Pakistan has been accused by India, Afghanistan, the United States,[23][24] the United Kingdom,[25] of involvement in terrorism in Kashmir and Afghanistan.[26] In July 2009, current President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari admitted that the Pakistani government had "created and nurtured" terrorist groups to achieve its short-term foreign policy goals.[27] According to an analysis published by Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings Institution in 2008 Pakistan was the world's "most active" state sponsor of terrorism including aiding groups and Pakistan has long aided a range of terrorist groups fighting against India in Kashmir and is a major sponsor of Taliban forces fighting the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan.[28]

Insurgency in Kashmir[edit | edit source]

According to some reports published by the Council of Foreign Relations, the Pakistan military and the ISI have provided covert support to terrorist groups active in Kashmir, including the al-Qaeda affiliate Jaish-e-Mohammed".[29][30] Pakistan has denied any involvement in terrorist activities in Kashmir, arguing that it only provides political and moral support to the secessionist groups who wish to escape Indian rule. Many Kashmiri militant groups also maintain their headquarters in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which is cited as further proof by the Indian government. Many of the terrorist organisations are banned by the UN, but continue to operate under different names.[31]

According to an analysis published by Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings Institution, Pakistan was the world's "most active" state sponsor of terrorism including aiding groups and Pakistan has long aided a range of terrorist groups fighting against India in Kashmir and is a major sponsor of Taliban forces.[28]

Author Gordon Thomas stated that Pakistan "still sponsored terrorist groups in the disputed state of Kashmir, funding, training and arming them in their war on attrition against India."[32] Journalist Stephen Suleyman Schwartz notes that several militant and criminal groups are "backed by senior officers in the Pakistani army, the country's ISI intelligence establishment and other armed bodies of the state."[33]

List of some insurgent attacks[edit | edit source]

Insurgents attack on Jammu and Kashmir State Assembly: A car bomb exploded near the Jammu and Kashmir State Assembly on 1 October 2001, killing 27 people on an attack that was blamed on Kashmiri separatists. It was one of the most prominent attacks against India apart from on the Indian Parliament in December 2001. The dead bodies of the terrorists and the data recovered from them revealed that Pakistan was solely responsible for the activity.[3]

  • 1997 Sangrampora massacre: On 21 March 1997, 7 Kashmiri Pandits were killed in Sangrampora village in the Budgam district.
  • Wandhama Massacre: In January 1998, 24 Kashmiri Pandits living in the city Wandhama were killed by Islamic terrorists.
  • Qasim Nagar Attack: On 13 July 2003, armed men believed to be a part of the Lashkar-e-Toiba threw hand grenades at the Qasim Nagar market in Srinagar and then fired on civilians standing nearby killing twenty-seven and injuring many more.[4]
  • Assassination of Abdul Ghani Lone: Abdul Ghani Lone, a prominent All Party Hurriyat Conference leader, was assassinated by an unidentified gunmen during a memorial rally in Srinagar. The assassination resulted in wide-scale demonstrations against the Indian occupied-forces for failing to provide enough security cover for Mr. Lone.[5]
  • 20 July 2005 Srinagar Bombing: A car bomb exploded near an armoured Indian Army vehicle in the famous Church Lane area in Srinagar killing four Indian Army personnel, one civilian and the suicide bomber. Terrorist group Hizbul Mujahideen, claimed responsibility for the attack.[6]
  • Budshah Chowk attack: A terrorist attack on 29 July 2005 at Srinigar's city centre, Budshah Chowk, killed two and left more than 17 people injured. Most of those injured were media journalists.[7]
  • Murder of Ghulam Nabi Lone: On 18 October 2005 suspected man killed Jammu and Kashmir's then education minister Ghulam Nabi Lone. No Terrorist group claimed responsibility for the attack. [8]

Human rights violations by India[edit | edit source]

Pakistan has accused India of gross human rights violations in Indian-administered Kashmir. A report by the Human Rights Watch stated two main reasons for the improving human rights condition in the region: First, sincere efforts were made by the new Jammu and Kashmir state government headed by Mufti Muhammad Sayeed to investigate cases of human rights abuses in the state and to punish those guilty including Indian soldiers. More than 15 Indian army soldiers were convicted by the Indian government in 2004 for carrying out human rights abuses in the state. Second, the decrease in cross-border infiltration into India by armed insurgents.[9]

Insurgent activities elsewhere[edit | edit source]

The attack on the Indian Parliament was by far the most dramatic attack carried out allegedly by Pakistani terrorists. India blamed Pakistan for carrying out the attacks, an allegation which Pakistan strongly denied and one that brought both nations to the brink of a nuclear confrontation in 2001–02. However, international peace efforts ensured the cooling of tensions between the two nuclear-capable nations.

Apart from this, the most notable was the hijacking of Indian Airlines Flight IC 814 en route New Delhi from Kathmandu, Nepal. The plane was hijacked on 24 December 1999 approximately one hour after take off and was taken to Amritsar airport and then to Lahore in Pakistan. After refueling the plane took off for Dubai and then finally landed in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Under intense media pressure, New Delhi complied with the hijackers' demand and freed Maulana Masood Azhar from its captivity in return for the freedom of the Indian passengers on the flight. The decision, however, cost New Delhi dearly. Maulana, who is believed to be hiding in Karachi, later became the leader of Jaish-e-Mohammed, an organisation which has carried out several terrorist acts against Indian security forces in Kashmir.[10]

On 22 December 2000, a group of terrorists belonging to the Lashkar-e-Toiba stormed the famous Red Fort in New Delhi. The Fort houses an Indian military unit and a high-security interrogation cell used both by the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Indian Army. The terrorists successfully breached the security cover around the Red Fort and opened fire at the Indian military personnel on duty killing two of them on spot. The attack was significant because it was carried out just two days after the declaration of the cease-fire between India and Pakistan.[11]

In 2002, India claimed again that terrorists from Jammu and Kashmir were infiltrating into India, a claim denied by Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, who claimed that such infiltration had stopped—India's spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry did away with Pakistan's claim, calling it "terminological inexactitude."[34] Only two months later, two Kashmiri terrorists belonging to Jaish-e-Mohammed raided the Swami Narayan temple complex in Ahmedabad, Gujarat killing 30 people, including 18 women and five children. The attack was carried out on 25 September 2002, just few days after state elections were held in Jammu and Kashmir. Two identical letters found on both the terrorists claimed that the attack was done in retaliation for the deaths of thousands of Muslims during the Gujarat riots.[12]

Two car bombs exploded in south Mumbai on 25 August 2003; one near the Gateway of India and the other at the famous Zaveri Bazaar, killing at least 48 and injuring 150 people. Though no terrorist group claimed responsibility for the attacks, Mumbai Police and RAW suspected Lashkar-e-Toiba's hand in the twin blasts.[13]

In an unsuccessful attempt, six terrorists belonging to Lashkar-e-Toiba, stormed the Ayodhya Ram Janmbhomi complex on 5 July 2005. Before the terrorists could reach the main disputed site, they were shot down by Indian security forces. One Hindu worshipper and two policemen were injured during the incident.[14]

The Indian intelligence agency RAW is claimed to be working in cover to malign Pakistan and train & support insurgents for Balochistan conflict.[35][36][37][38]

2007 Samjhauta Express bombings[edit | edit source]

Main article: 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings

The 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings was a terrorist attack targeted on the Samjhauta Express train on 18 February. The Samjhauta Express is an international train that runs from New Delhi, India to Lahore, Pakistan, and is one of two trains to cross the India-Pakistan border. At least 68 people were killed, mostly Pakistani civilians but also some Indian security personnel and civilians.[39] Prasad Shrikant Purohit, an Indian Army officer and leader of a shadowy Hindu fundamentalist group, was later identified and investigated as a key suspect responsible for the bombing. The attack was a turning point in Indo-Pakistani relations, and one of the many terrorist incidents that have plagued relations between the two.

2008 Mumbai attacks[edit | edit source]

Main article: 2008 Mumbai attacks

The 2008 Mumbai attacks by ten Pakistani terrorists killed over 173 and wounded 308. The sole surviving gunman Ajmal Kasab who was arrested during the attacks was found to be a Pakistani national. This fact was acknowledged by Pakistani authorities.[40] In May 2010, an Indian court convicted him on four counts of murder, waging war against India, conspiracy and terrorism offences, and sentenced him to death.[41]

India blamed the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based militant group, for planning and executing the attacks. Islamabad resisted the claims and demanded evidence. India provided evidence in the form of interrogations, weapons, candy wrappers, Pakistani Brand Milk Packets, and telephone sets.[42] Indian officials demanded Pakistan extradite suspects for trial. They also said that, given the sophistication of the attacks, the perpetrators "must have had the support of some official agencies in Pakistan".[43]

Nuclear programmes[edit | edit source]

India voiced increasing concern over Pakistani arms purchases, U.S. military aid to Pakistan, and a clandestine nuclear weapons programme. In an effort to curtail tensions, the two countries formed a joint commission to examine disputes. In December 1988, Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Rajiv Gandhi concluded a pact not to attack each other's nuclear facilities. Agreements on cultural exchanges and civil aviation were also initiated.

In May 1998 India, and then Pakistan, conducted nuclear tests. (See Smiling Buddha and Operation Shakti (India), and Chagai-I and Chagai-II) (Pakistan).)

Simla Agreement[edit | edit source]

After the 1971 war, Pakistan and India made slow progress towards the normalisation of relations. In July 1972, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistani President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto met in the Indian hill station of Simla. They signed the Simla Agreement, by which India would return all Pakistani personnel (over 90,000) and captured territory in the west, and the two countries would "settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations." Diplomatic and trade relations were also re-established in 1976.

Talks and other confidence building measures[edit | edit source]

In 1997, high-level Indo-Pakistan talks resumed after a three-year pause. The Prime Ministers of Pakistan and India met twice and the foreign secretaries conducted three rounds of talks. In June 1997, the foreign secretaries identified eight "outstanding issues" around which continuing talks would be focused. The dispute over the status of Kashmir, (referred by India as Jammu and Kashmir), an issue since Independence, remains the major stumbling block in their dialogue. India maintains that the entire former princely state is an integral part of the Indian union, while Pakistan insists that UN resolutions calling for self-determination of the people of the state/province must be taken into account. It however refuses to abide by the previous part of the resolution, which calls for it to vacate all territories occupied.

In September 1997, the talks broke down over the structure of how to deal with the issues of Kashmir, and peace and security. Pakistan advocated that the issues be treated by separate working groups. India responded that the two issues be taken up along with six others on a simultaneous basis.

Attempts to restart dialogue between the two nations were given a major boost by the February 1999 meeting of both Prime Ministers in Lahore and their signing of three agreements.

A subsequent military coup in Pakistan that overturned the democratically elected Nawaz Sharif government in October of the same year also proved a setback to relations.

In 2001, a summit was called in Agra; Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf turned up to meet Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee. The talks fell through.

On 20 June 2004, with a new government in place in India, both countries agreed to extend a nuclear testing ban and to set up a hotline between their foreign secretaries aimed at preventing misunderstandings that might lead to a nuclear war.[44]

Baglihar Dam issue was a new issue raised by Pakistan in 2005.

Developments since 2004[edit | edit source]

After Dr. Manmohan Singh become prime minister of India in May 2004, the Punjab provincial Government declared it would develop Gah, his place of birth, as a model village in his honour and name a school after him.[45] There is also a village in India named Pakistan, despite occasional pressure over the years to change its name the villagers have resisted.[46]

Violent activities in the region declined in 2004. There are two main reasons for this: warming of relations between New Delhi and Islamabad which consequently lead to a ceasefire between the two countries in 2003 and the fencing of the LOC being carried out by the Indian Army. Moreover, coming under intense international pressure, Islamabad was compelled to take actions against the militants' training camps on its territory. In 2004, the two countries also agreed upon decreasing the number of troops present in the region.

Under pressure, Kashmiri militant organisations made an offer for talks and negotiations with New Delhi, which India welcomed.

India's Border Security Force blamed the Pakistani military for providing cover-fire for the terrorists whenever they infiltrated into Indian territory from Pakistan. Pakistan in turn has also blamed India for providing support to terrorist organizations operating in Pakistan such as the BLA.

In 2005, Pakistan's information minister, Sheikh Rashid, was alleged to have run a terrorist training camp in 1990 in N.W. Frontier, Pakistan. The Pakistani government dismissed the charges against its minister as an attempt to hamper the ongoing peace process between the two neighbours.

Both India and Pakistan have launched several mutual confidence-building measures (CBMs) to ease tensions between the two. These include more high-level talks, easing visa restrictions, and restarting of cricket matches between the two. The new bus service between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad has also helped bring the two sides closer. Pakistan and India have also decided to co-operate on economic fronts.

Some improvements in the relations are seen with the re-opening of a series of transportation networks near the India–Pakistan border, with the most important being bus routes and railway lines.

A major clash between Indian security forces and militants occurred when a group of insurgents tried to infiltrate into Kashmir from Pakistan in July 2005. The same month also saw a Kashmiri militant attack on Ayodhya and Srinagar. However, these developments had little impact on the peace process.

An Indian man held in Pakistani prisons since 1975 as an accused spy walked across the border to freedom 3 March 2008, an unconditional release that Pakistan said was done to improve relations between the two countries.[47]

In 2006, a "Friends Without Borders" scheme began with the help of two British tourists. The idea was that Indian and Pakistani children would make pen pals and write friendly letters to each other. The idea was so successful in both countries that the organisation found it "impossible to keep up". The World's Largest Love Letter was recently sent from India to Pakistan.[48]

In December 2010, several Pakistani newspapers published stories about India's leadership and relationship with militants in Pakistan that the papers claimed were found in the United States diplomatic cables leak. A British newspaper, The Guardian, which had the Wikileaks cables in its possession reviewed the cables and concluded that the Pakistani claims were "not accurate" and that "WikiLeaks [was] being exploited for propaganda purposes."[49]

On 10 February 2011, India agreed to resume talks with Pakistan which were suspended after 26/11 Mumbai Attacks.[50] India had put on hold all the diplomatic relations saying it will only continue if Pakistan will act against the accused of Mumbai attacks.

On April 13, 2012 following a thaw in relations whereby India gained MFN status in the country, India announced the removal of restrictions on FDI investment from Pakistan to India.[51]

The Foreign Minister of Pakistan on 11 July 2012, stated in Pnom Penh that her country is willing to resolve some of the disputes like, Sir Creek and Siachan on the basis of agreements reached in past.[52] On 7 September 2012, Indian External Affairs Minister would pay 3 day visit to Pakistan to review the progress of bilateral dialogue with his Pakistani counterpart.[53]

2001 Gujarat Earthquake in India[edit | edit source]

Pakistani President Pervez Mushrraf sent a plane load of relief supplies to India from Islamabad to Ahmedabad.[54] That carried 200 tents and more than 2,000 Blankets.[55] Furthermore the President called Indian PM to express his 'sympathy' over the loss from the earthquake.[56]

2005 Earthquake in Pakistan[edit | edit source]

India offered generous aid to Pakistan in response to the 2005 Earthquake. Indian and Pakistani High Commissioners consulted with one another regarding cooperation in relief work. India sent 25 tonnes of relief material to Pakistan including food, blankets and medicine. Large Indian companies such as Infosys have offered aid up to $226,000. On 12 October, an Ilyushin-76 cargo plane ferried across seven truckloads (about 82 tons) of army medicines, 15,000 blankets and 50 tents and returned to New Delhi. A senior airforce official also stated that they had been asked by the Indian government to be ready to fly out another similar consignment.[57] On 14 October, India dispatched the second consignment of relief material to Pakistan, by train through the Wagah Border. The consignment included 5,000 blankets, 370 tents, 5 tons of plastic sheets and 12 tons of medicine. A third consignment of medicine and relief material was also sent shortly afterwards by train.[58] India also pledged $25 million as aid to Pakistan.[59] India opened the first of three points at Chakan Da Bagh, in Poonch, on the Line of Control (LoC) between India and Pakistan for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake relief work. (Rediff) Such generous gestures signalled a new age in confidence, friendliness and cooperation between both India and Pakistan.

Possible solutions to the Kashmir issue[edit | edit source]

Many consider that the best way to end present violence in Kashmir is negotiations between various Kashmiri-separatists groups, Pakistan and India. Here are a few possible solutions [60] to the Kashmir dispute[15]

The status quo Currently a boundary – the Line of Control (LOC)- divides the region in two, with one part administered by India and one by Pakistan. India would like to formalize this status quo and make it the accepted international boundary. Factors Opposing – Pakistan rejects the plan as the line of control is a cease fire line, not an international border formalizing status quo would be in violation of UN resolution. Kashmiri political parties too would oppose the plan as it violates the UN resolution for a referendum.
Referendum as proposed by the UN Pakistan insists on this solution which was proposed after ceasefire of the first Kashmir war while India insists on Kashmir being an integral part of India.
Kashmir becomes a part of India Though New Delhi and of the Hindu population of Jammu and Buddhists in Ladakh would have no objections to such a plan.[61] Factors Opposing– The Muslim majority population of Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir would object to the outcome as would the Muslim majority in Indian administered Kashmir, specifically in Kashmir valley.
The status quo for something else Pakistan accepts the status quo in return for India giving away disputed Sir Creek
Kashmir becomes a part of Pakistan Kashmir joining Pakistan. Factors Opposing– The communities of Hindus of Jammu and the Buddhists of Ladakh would object the outcome. Hindu Kashmiri Pandits, who were forced out of Kashmir by militants are also a major topic to consider.
Kashmir becomes an independent sovereign republic As an independent state, the region would most likely be economically viable with tourism probably being the largest source of income, however being a landlocked country, it would be heavily dependent on India and Pakistan. Factors Opposing – The outcome is unlikely because it requires both India and Pakistan (and potentially China) to give up territory.
A smaller independent Kashmir A smaller independent Kashmir formed out of the current strip of Kashmir (administered by Pakistan) and the Kashmir valley (controlled by India). This would leave the Northern areas with Pakistan while India retains Jammu and Ladakh. However this region should maintain good relations with both India and Pakistan as it is landlocked and is covered with snow in winter. This region can also have its defence and foreign relations jointly handled by India and Pakistan. Factors Opposing – The outcome is unlikely because it requires both India and Pakistan to give up territory.

Fugitives[edit | edit source]

India has accused some of the most wanted Indian fugitives, such as Dawood Ibrahim, of having a presence in Pakistan. On 11 May 2011, India released a list of 50 "Most Wanted Fugitives" hiding in Pakistan. This was to tactically pressurize Pakistan after the killing of Osama bin Laden in his compound in Abbottabad.[62]

After two errors in the list received publicity, the Central Bureau of Investigation removed it from their website pending a review.[63] After this incident the Pakistani interior ministry rejected the list of 50 Most Wanted men forwarded by India to Islamabad, saying it should first probe if those named in the list were even living in the country.[64]

Social relations[edit | edit source]

Cultural links[edit | edit source]

India and Pakistan, to some degree have similar cultures, cuisines and languages which underpin the historical ties between the two. Pakistani singers, musicians, comedians and entertainers have enjoyed widespread popularity in India, with many achieving overnight fame in the Indian filming industry Bollywood. Likewise, Indian music and films are very popular in Pakistan. Being located in the northernmost region of the South Asia, Pakistan's culture is somewhat similar to that of North India.

The Punjab region was split into Punjab, Pakistan and Punjab, India following the independence and partition of the two countries in 1947. The Punjabi people are today the largest ethnic group in Pakistan and also an important ethnic group of northern India. The founder of the Sikhism religion was born in the modern-day Pakistani Punjab province, in the city of Nankana Sahib. Each year, millions of Indian Sikh pilgrims cross over to visit holy Sikh sites in Nankana Sahib. The Sindhi people are the native ethnic group of the Pakistani province of Sindh. Many Hindu Sindhis migrated to India in 1947, making the country home to a sizable Sindhi community. In addition, the millions of Muslims who migrated from India to the newly-created Pakistan during independence came to be known as the Muhajir people; they are settled predominantly in Karachi and still maintain family links in India.

Relations between Pakistan and India have also resumed through platforms such as media and communications. Aman ki Asha is a joint venture and campaign between The Times of India and the Jang Group calling for mutual peace and development of diplomatic and cultural relations.

Geographic links[edit | edit source]

Main article: Indo-Pakistani border
File:International border at Wagah - evening flag lowering ceremony.jpg

The evening flag lowering ceremony at the India-Pakistan International Border near Wagah.

The Indo-Pakistani border is the official international boundary that demarcates the Indian states of Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat from the Pakistani provinces of Punjab and Sindh. The Wagah border is the only road crossing between India and Pakistan and lies on the famous Grand Trunk Road, connecting Lahore, Pakistan with Amritsar, India. Each evening, the Wagah border ceremony takes place at the Wagah border in which the flags are lowered and guards on both sides make a pompous military display and exchange handshakes.

Linguistic ties[edit | edit source]

Hindi and Urdu are an Indo-Aryan language and the linga franca, as well as national language, of North India and Pakistan respectively. Standard Urdu is mutually intelligible with Standard Hindi. Both languages share the same Indic base and are so similar in phonology and grammar that they appear to be one language. Most linguists consider them to be two standardized forms of a same language; thus, a speaker of Urdu, the national language in Pakistan, can usually understand a speaker of Hindi, which is the primary official language of the Republic of India.

Apart from Hindi and Urdu, India and Pakistan also share a distribution of the Punjabi language (written in the Gurmukhi script in Indian Punjab, and the Shahmukhi script in Pakistani Punjab), Kashmiri language and Sindhi language.

Matrimonial ties[edit | edit source]

Some Indian and Pakistani people marry across the border, particularly with present generation of relatives who had migrated from India at the time of partition.

In April 2010 a high profile Pakistani cricketer, Shoaib Malik married the Indian tennis star Sania Mirza.[65] The wedding received much media attention and was said to transfix both India and Pakistan.[66]

Sporting ties[edit | edit source]

Main article: Sports diplomacy#Cricket

Cricket and hockey matches between the two (as well as other sports to a lesser degree such as those of the SAARC games) have often been political in nature. During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan General Zia-ul Haq traveled to India for a bout of "cricket diplomacy" to keep India from supporting the Soviets by opening another front. Pervez Musharaff also tried to do the same more than a decade later but to no avail.

In tennis, Rohan Bopanna of India and Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi of Pakistan have formed a successful duo and have been dubbed as the "Indo-Pak Express."[67]

Transport links[edit | edit source]

Main article: Transport between India and Pakistan

Diasporic relations[edit | edit source]

The large size of the Indian diaspora and Pakistani diaspora in many different countries throughout the world has created strong diasporic relations. British Indians and British Pakistanis, the largest and second-largest ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom respectively, are said to have friendly relations with one another.[68][69] It is quite common for a "Little India" and a "Little Pakistan" to co-exist in South Asian ethnic enclaves in overseas countries. There are various cities such as Birmingham, Blackburn and Manchester where British Indians and British Pakistanis live alongside each other in peace and harmony. Both Indians and Pakistanis living in the UK fit under the category of British Asian. The UK is also home to the Pakistan & India friendship forum.[70] In the United States, Indians and Pakistanis are classified under the South Asian American category and share many cultural traits. The British MEP Saj Karim is of Pakistani origin. He is a member of the European Parliament Friends of India Group, Karim was also responsible for opening up Europe to free trade with India.[71][72] He narrowly escaped the Mumbai attacks at Hotel Taj in November 2008. Despite the atrocity, Mr Karim does not wish the remaining killer Ajmal Kasab to be sentenced to death. He said: "I believe he had a fair and transparent trial and I support the guilty verdict. "But I am not a supporter of capital punishment. I believe he should be given a life sentence, but that life should mean life."

Economic relations[edit | edit source]

Trade links[edit | edit source]

Trade across direct routes has been curtailed formally, [73] so the bulk of India-Pakistan trade is routed through Dubai.[74]

Re-evaluation[edit | edit source]

The insurgents who initially started their movement as a pro-Kashmiri independence movement, have gone through a lot of change in their ideology. Most of the insurgents portray their struggle as a religious one.

Indian analysts allege that by supporting these insurgents, Pakistan is trying to wage a proxy war against India while Pakistan claims that it regards most of these insurgent groups as "freedom fighters" rather than terrorists

Internationally known to be the most deadly theatre of conflict, nearly 10 million people, including Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists, have been fighting a daily battle for survival. The cross-border firing between India and Pakistan, and the terrorist attacks combined have taken its toll on the Kashmiris, who have suffered poor living standards and an erosion of human rights.

Country comparison[edit | edit source]

22x20px India 22x20px Pakistan
Population 1,210,193,422[75] 170,600,000
Area 3,287,240 km² (1,269,210 sq mi) 796,095 km² (307,374 sq mi)
Population density 382/km² (922/sq mi) 214.3/km² (555/sq mi)
Capital New Delhi Islamabad
Largest city Mumbai Karachi
Government Federal republic, Parliamentary democracy Islamic Parliamentary Republic
Official languages Hindi, English and 20 other official languages Urdu, English
Main religions 80.5% Hinduism, 13.4% Islam, 2.3% Christianity, 1.9% Sikhism, 0.8% Buddhism, 0.4% Jainism[76] 95-98% Islam (80-95% Sunni, 5-20% Shi'a), 1.6% Christianity, 1.6% Hinduism, others
GDP (nominal) $1.537 trillion ($1,265 per capita) $174.866 billion ($1,049 per capita)
GDP (PPP) $4.06 trillion ($3,339 per capita) $464 billion ($2400 per capita)
Military expenditures $36.03 billion (1.83% of GDP) $5.1 billion (2.8% of GDP)

See also[edit | edit source]

[[File:Template:Portal/Images/Default|32x28px|alt=Portal icon]] India portal
[[File:Template:Portal/Images/Default|32x28px|alt=Portal icon]] Pakistan portal

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, pp. 221–222
  2. Census of Indian: Religious Composition
  3. Area, Population, Density and Urban/Rural Proportion by Administrative Units
  4. Pakistan acknowledges suspect in Mumbai attacks is a Pakistani
  5. Lumby 1954, p. 238
  6. "Letter Inviting India to Intervene". http://www.hellojunagadh.com/history_letter.aspx. Retrieved 16 October 2011. 
  7. Lumby 1954, pp. 238–239
  8. Kashmir: The origins of the dispute
  9. Mehr Chand Mahajan (1963). Looking Back. Bombay: Asia Publishing House (Digitalized by Google at the University of Michigan). p. 162. ISBN 81-241-0194-9 9788124101940. 
  10. Haroon, Sana (1 December 2007). Frontier of faith: Islam in the Indo-Afghan borderland. Columbia University Press. pp. 179–180. ISBN 978-0-231-70013-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=20VIdFUoC3UC&pg=PA179. Retrieved 26 February 2012. 
  11. "October 27, 1947: Dakota in my dell ~ FRONTLINE KASHMIR". Frontlinekashmir.org. 2011-10-27. http://www.frontlinekashmir.org/2011/10/october-27-1947-dakota-in-my-dell.html. Retrieved 2012-04-13. 
  12. Instrument of Accession
  13. Chandigarh, India – Main News. Tribuneindia.com. Retrieved on 2011-04-14.
  14. bangla[@]gmail.com. "Mukti Bahini". Banglapedia.search.com.bd. http://banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/M_0380.htm. Retrieved 2009-09-28. 
  15. "Mission Pakistan"-Maloy Krishna Dhar
  16. "Documents on Crimes against Humanity Committed by Pakistan Army and their agents in Bangladesh during 1971". Bangladeshmariners.com. http://www.bangladeshmariners.com/HmdrRprt/violat.html. Retrieved 2009-09-28. 
  17. "Case Study: Genocide in Bangladesh, 1971". Gendercide.org. http://www.gendercide.org/case_bangladesh.html. Retrieved 2009-09-28. 
  18. "Unquenchable thirst." The Economist, 19 November 2011.
  19. Haleem, Abdul; Lin Jing (7 Jul. 2008). "Militants mounting pressure to destabilize Afghan gov't". news.xinhuanet.com. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-07/07/content_8506817.htm. Retrieved 7 Jul. 2008. 
  20. 20.0 20.1 Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt (1 Aug 2008). "Pakistanis Aided Attack in Kabul, U.S. Officials Say". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/asia/01pstan.html. 
  21. Tran, Mark (1 Aug. 2008). "Pakistan condemns New York Times claims". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/aug/01/pakistan.usa. Retrieved 22 Apr. 2010. 
  22. Christina Lamb (3 Aug 2008). "Rogue Pakistan spies aid Taliban in Afghanistan (Times Online)"]. The Times of London. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article4449330.ece. 
  23. International Terrorism: Threats and Responses: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary By United States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary, ISBN 0-16-052230-7, 1996, pp482
  24. Overview of State-Sponsored Terrorism April 30, 2001 U.S. State Department
  25. "Daily Times Story". Dailytimes.com.pk. 2002-05-29. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-5-2002_pg1_1. Retrieved 2010-06-21. 
  26. Pakistan's link to Afghan terrorism
  27. Nelson, Dean (2009-07-08). "Pakistani president Asif Zardari admits creating terrorist groups - by Telegraph UK". London: Telegraph.co.uk. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/5779916/Pakistani-president-Asif-Zardari-admits-creating-terrorist-groups.html. Retrieved 2010-06-21. 
  28. 28.0 28.1 The Changing Nature of State Sponsorship of Terrorism, Brookings Institution
  29. The ISI and Terrorism: Behind the Accusations, Council on Foreign Relations, 2009-05-28
  30. Terrorism Havens: Pakistan - Council on Foreign Relations
  31. Kashmiri militants chafe at warmer India-Pakistan ties, The Christian Science Monitor, 2003-05-28
  32. Thomas, Gordon (2007). Gideon's Spies. Macmillan. p. 536. ISBN 0-312-36152-1. http://books.google.com/?id=pb80XoP5jvUC&dq=state+sponsored+terrorism+pakistan. 
  33. Stephen Schwartz (19 August 2006). "A threat to the world". The Spectator. http://www.spectator.co.uk/archive/features/24639/a-threat-to-the-world.thtml. Retrieved 2007-09-20. 
  34. "India rejects Musharraf's claim on infiltration". The Economic Times. 28 July 2002. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2002-07-28/news/27364071_1_infiltration-pakistan-president-pervez-musharraf-state-colin-powell. Retrieved 15 July 2011. 
  35. "'RAW Is Training 600 Balochis In Afghanistan'". www.outlookindia.com. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?231032. Retrieved 2011-12-27. 
  36. "Pakistan Times! » RAW Creating Trouble for NATO in Afghanistan". Pak-times.com. 2010-09-25. http://www.pak-times.com/2008/09/05/raw-creating-trouble-for-nato-in-afghanistan/. Retrieved 2012-04-13. 
  37. "RAW collusion suspected: Probe faults Afghan serviceman for NATO air raid, says report – The Express Tribune". Tribune.com.pk. http://tribune.com.pk/story/308841/afghan-commander-orchestrated-nov-26-attack-report/. Retrieved 2011-12-27. 
  38. "RAW helping militants in Afghanistan: Musharraf". Rediff.com. 2004-12-31. http://www.rediff.com/news/2009/mar/08raw-helping-militants-in-afghanistan-says-musharraf.htm. Retrieved 2011-12-27. 
  39. At least 66 killed in India-Pakistan train blast
  40. Surviving gunman's identity established as Pakistani
  41. Ajmal Kasab sentenced to death for Mumbai attacks
  42. Pakistan is given evidence on attacks, AP story in NYT, 2009-01-05
  43. In Sharing Mumbai Findings, India Exhorts Pakistan to Act, Washington Post, 2009-01-06
  44. "CNN.com - Nuke hotline for India, Pakistan - Jun 20, 2004". Edition.cnn.com. 2004-06-20. http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/06/20/india.pakistan. Retrieved 2011-12-27. 
  45. Schoolmate wants to meet PM – The Hindu
  46. This 'Pakistan' has no Muslims
  47. . http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/04/india.prison.ap/index.html. [dead link]
  48. Friends Without Borders - international penpal program between India and Pakistan
  49. Declan Walsh, Pakistani media publish fake WikiLeaks cables attacking India The Guardian 9 December 2010
  50. "A New Turn in India Pakistan Ties". http://www.theworldreporter.com/2011/02/new-turn-in-india-pakistan-ties.html. 
  51. Banerji, Annie (13 April 2012). "India to allow FDI from Pakistan, open border post | Reuters". In.reuters.com. http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/india-pakistan-trade-fdi-investment-idINDEE83C04M20120413. Retrieved 2012-04-13. 
  52. "Pak willing to resolve bilateral disputes with India: Hina Rabbani Khar". 12 July 2012. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pak-willing-to-resolve-bilateral-disputes-with-india-hina-rabbani-khar/973482/. 
  53. "Krishna to undertake 3-day visit to Pakistan from Sept 7". 24 July 2012. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/krishna-to-undertake-3day-visit-to-pakistan-from-sept-7/978706/. 
  54. "Quake may improve India Pakistan ties". CNN. 2 February 2001. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/02/02/india.quake.02/. 
  55. "Rival Pakistan offers India help". BBC News. 30 January 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1139807.stm. 
  56. Gujarat gets Musharraf to dial PM in New Delhi
  57. Indian troops cross LoC to back up relief efforts -DAWN – Top Stories; 13 October 2005
  58. http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1518632,0008.htm
  59. BBC NEWS | South Asia | India offers Pakistan $25m in aid
  60. "Bbc News". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/south_asia/03/kashmir_future/html/default.stm. Retrieved 2011-12-27. 
  61. "Pro-India parties win majority in Kashmir elections". CNN. 28 December 2008. http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/12/28/indian.kashmir.vote/index.html. 
  62. "India releases list of 50 'most wanted fugitives' in Pak". Times Of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-releases-list-of-50-most-wanted-fugitives-in-Pak/articleshow/8243293.cms. Retrieved 22 May 2011. 
  63. "India: 'Most wanted' errors embarrass government". BBC News (BBC). 20 May 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13465908. Retrieved 20 May 2011. 
  64. "Pakistan rejects India's list of 50 most wanted". Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistan-rejects-Indias-list-of-50-most-wanted/articleshow/8560151.cms. 
  65. "Shoaib's family impressed by hospitality in India". The Times Of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/events-tournaments/sania-shoaib-wedding/Shoaibs-impressed-by-hospitality-in-India/articleshow/5827685.cms. [dead link]
  66. "Sania Mirza weds Shoaib Malik after divorce row". Reuters. 12 April 2010. http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-47624320100412. 
  67. The Indo-Pak Express rolls on, The Economic Times
  68. The British Asian Trust | Registered Charity 1127366 | 20th member of The Prince’s Charities
  69. [1][dead link]
  70. Official UK Launch of the Pakistan India Friendship Forum On 8 February 200 7At The House Of Commons
  71. Your MEPs : Sajjad KARIM
  72. EU-India: Free Trade Agreement to be signed by the end of 2010 say MEPs
  73. Nisha Taneja (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations); Shaheen Rafi Khan, Moeed Yusuf, Shahbaz Bokhari, and Shoaib Aziz (SDPI, Islamabad). "Chapter 4: India–Pakistan Trade: The View from the Indian Side (p. 72-77) Chapter 5: Quantifying Informal Trade Between Pakistan and India (p. 87-104)". In Zareen Fatima Naqvi and Philip Schuler. The Challenges and Potential of Pakistan-India Trade. (The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, June 2007). http://nub.academia.edu/NishaAkter/Papers/910718/The_Challenges_and_Potential_of_Pakistan-India_Trade. Retrieved 29 August 2012. 
  74. Ahmed, Sadiq; Ghani, Ejaz. "South Asia’s Growth and Regional Integration: An Overview". World Bank. p. 33. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/Publications/448813-1171648504958/SAR_integration_overview.pdf. Retrieved 29 August 2012. 
  75. [2][dead link]
  76. "CIA World Factbook - India". CIA. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html. Retrieved 20 June 2011. 
  • Budania, Rajpal, "India's Pakistan Policy: A Study in the Context of Security," South Asian Studies, Vol.30:2,1995.
  • Burke,S.M.,Mainsprings of Indian and Pakistani Foreign Policies, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, 1974.
  • Brines Russel, The Indo-Pakistan Conflict, London, Pall Mall Press, 1968.

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Indo-Pakistani relations Template:Foreign relations of India Template:Foreign relations of Pakistan

hi:भारत-पाकिस्तान सम्बन्ध pt:Relações entre Índia e Paquistão fi:Intian ja Pakistanin kiistat sv:Konflikten mellan Indien och Pakistan

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.