The lawyers argued that the NSA, through its warrantless wiretap program, had violated their attorney-client privilege. They referred to the January 18, 2006 lawsuit CCR v. Bush, and called the NSA's response "inadequate". They assert that while the Government had released 85 pages of documents they had withheld another 85 that the law obliged them to release.
The other lawyers participating in the suit are:
References[edit | edit source]
- Mike Rosen-Molina (May 19, 2007). "Ex-Guantanamo lawyers sue for recordings of client meetings". The Jurist. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/05/ex-guantanamo-lawyers-sue-for.php. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- "Wilner v. NSA". The Jurist. Archived from the original on May 23, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070523183659/http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/legal/september_11th/sept11Article.asp?ObjID=DmJtlh90ID&Content=1035. Retrieved May 22, 2007.
- "Wilner v. NSA" (PDF). Center for Constitutional Rights. June 19, 2009. http://ccrjustice.org/files/Wilner_FOIANSAComplaint.pdf. Retrieved June 19, 2009.